astro_rabbit
Newbie
 Offline
Posts: 29
|
 |
« on: January 21, 2010, 10:23:00 am » |
|
Is anyone playing this for 2x2x2 or 3x3x3
I use it for the 2x2x2
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
rachmaninovian
|
|
« Reply #1 on: January 21, 2010, 10:59:18 pm » |
|
wtf is this method??
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
sandwich ftw! http://rachmaninovian.webs.com2x2: pb 1.xx(?), ba (10/12) 3.3x 3x3: pb 13.43, ba (10/12) 18.03 4x4: pb 42.86, ba (10/12) 52.69 5x5: pb 1:40.59, ba (10/12) 1:52.30 6x6: pb 3:35.xx 7x7: pb 5:55.55 other pbs: k4 - 58.xx redux(4) - 1:02.xx, ba (10/12) 1:18.xx redux(5) - 2:36.xx fridrich(3x3) pb 13.09 (12.90), ba (10/12) 18.25 |
|
|
Jt
Slacker
Administrator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 910
Shake Leg Department
|
|
« Reply #2 on: January 21, 2010, 11:01:32 pm » |
|
http://home.wanadoo.nl/~r.mulderij/2x2x2.htmFor your own good I'd recommend learning a better method such as Ortega
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: January 21, 2010, 11:05:50 pm by Jt »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
astro_rabbit
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 29
|
|
« Reply #5 on: January 22, 2010, 01:42:02 pm » |
|
If you want my Mulderji Cheat Sheet, then send me a PM with your EMAIL address, and I will email a PDF to you.
All the moves you need to do on a single side of A4.
Alternatively, I can emboss one for you. But that will cost you Sing$1.
The Mulderji method is based on making an L-shape on top and bottom faces
The top L needs to have 2 edges solved.
For the bottom L there are only 4 distinct cases to recognise for fully solving the cube.
However this method is more based around pattern recognition, and one case is difficult to deal with.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
rachmaninovian
|
|
« Reply #6 on: January 22, 2010, 09:14:48 pm » |
|
i can average sub4 for 2x2, so why bother learning this? hehehehehe. anyways, can you send me a copy of the pdf file? would appreciate that.  |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: January 22, 2010, 09:19:14 pm by rachmaninovian »
|
Logged
|
sandwich ftw! http://rachmaninovian.webs.com2x2: pb 1.xx(?), ba (10/12) 3.3x 3x3: pb 13.43, ba (10/12) 18.03 4x4: pb 42.86, ba (10/12) 52.69 5x5: pb 1:40.59, ba (10/12) 1:52.30 6x6: pb 3:35.xx 7x7: pb 5:55.55 other pbs: k4 - 58.xx redux(4) - 1:02.xx, ba (10/12) 1:18.xx redux(5) - 2:36.xx fridrich(3x3) pb 13.09 (12.90), ba (10/12) 18.25 |
|
|
astro_rabbit
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 29
|
|
« Reply #7 on: January 22, 2010, 10:52:06 pm » |
|
I'll convert the file to a JPEG and post in the forum Monday, cos it is on my work computer. And get the 1$ from the forum administrator later |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
rachmaninovian
|
|
« Reply #8 on: January 23, 2010, 07:48:17 pm » |
|
how fast is this method anyways? heh.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
sandwich ftw! http://rachmaninovian.webs.com2x2: pb 1.xx(?), ba (10/12) 3.3x 3x3: pb 13.43, ba (10/12) 18.03 4x4: pb 42.86, ba (10/12) 52.69 5x5: pb 1:40.59, ba (10/12) 1:52.30 6x6: pb 3:35.xx 7x7: pb 5:55.55 other pbs: k4 - 58.xx redux(4) - 1:02.xx, ba (10/12) 1:18.xx redux(5) - 2:36.xx fridrich(3x3) pb 13.09 (12.90), ba (10/12) 18.25 |
|
|
|
Alpha
|
|
« Reply #9 on: January 25, 2010, 09:56:19 am » |
|
And get the 1$ from the forum administrator later What $1?? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
rachmaninovian
|
|
« Reply #10 on: January 25, 2010, 02:26:35 pm » |
|
lol you can claim from me if no one pays. you have to find me though =p
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
sandwich ftw! http://rachmaninovian.webs.com2x2: pb 1.xx(?), ba (10/12) 3.3x 3x3: pb 13.43, ba (10/12) 18.03 4x4: pb 42.86, ba (10/12) 52.69 5x5: pb 1:40.59, ba (10/12) 1:52.30 6x6: pb 3:35.xx 7x7: pb 5:55.55 other pbs: k4 - 58.xx redux(4) - 1:02.xx, ba (10/12) 1:18.xx redux(5) - 2:36.xx fridrich(3x3) pb 13.09 (12.90), ba (10/12) 18.25 |
|
|
astro_rabbit
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 29
|
|
« Reply #11 on: January 25, 2010, 06:09:51 pm » |
|
Just sent you by EMAIL, that'll be Sing$1 lol you can claim from me if no one pays. you have to find me though =p
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
rachmaninovian
|
|
« Reply #12 on: January 25, 2010, 10:27:58 pm » |
|
sure, now how do you collect the one buck? if you can meet up around clementi that would be great anyway, what do you mean by 1 pair of edges? =P there are NO edges on a 2x2  and there cannot be 2 pairs of edges solved..that would mean one layer is solved. a pair of corners =P |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: January 25, 2010, 10:45:18 pm by rachmaninovian »
|
Logged
|
sandwich ftw! http://rachmaninovian.webs.com2x2: pb 1.xx(?), ba (10/12) 3.3x 3x3: pb 13.43, ba (10/12) 18.03 4x4: pb 42.86, ba (10/12) 52.69 5x5: pb 1:40.59, ba (10/12) 1:52.30 6x6: pb 3:35.xx 7x7: pb 5:55.55 other pbs: k4 - 58.xx redux(4) - 1:02.xx, ba (10/12) 1:18.xx redux(5) - 2:36.xx fridrich(3x3) pb 13.09 (12.90), ba (10/12) 18.25 |
|
|
astro_rabbit
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 29
|
|
« Reply #13 on: January 25, 2010, 11:03:21 pm » |
|
Ai Yah, just substitute edges with corners then
And with this method, only possible to have 75% of the top layer solve, cos of the L shape.
I will incorporate your feedback into the sheet.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
donnellroyce
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 1
|
|
« Reply #14 on: October 14, 2011, 09:52:28 pm » |
|
Hi
I am not play,thanks for sharing.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
